Join Us  |   Site Map
Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Alleviation of Aflatoxin-B1 Toxicity by using Clay Adsorbent in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Diets

PJZ_49_2-399-404

 

 

Alleviation of Aflatoxin-B1 Toxicity by using Clay Adsorbent in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Diets

Dilawar Hussain* and Abdul Mateen

Department of Zoology, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-38040, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

The present study was designed to alleviate the aflatoxin-B1 toxicity by the use of 0.5% calcium bentonite clay and to evaluate its effect on the growth performance of Nile tilapia over a period of 10 weeks. Inclusion of AFB1 at both 2 and 4 ppm levels significantly (p<0.05) decreased specific growth rate (SGR), net weight gain (NWG), average daily gain (ADG), survival, feed intake, feed efficiency ratio (FER) and protein efficiency ratio (PRE), irrespective the addition of the 4TX in the diets. Among different dietary groups of the fish, % survival was not affected significantly (p<0.05). T1 showed maximum NWG (45.49±3.85), FER (0.739±0.02) and PER (36.36±1.83) when compared to other dietary treatment groups. The addition of 4TX clay in the diets at both 2 and 4 ppm AFB1 concentrations have almost the same effect on the growth parameters tested except in the case of PER. T3 (0.5% 4TX+2 ppm AFB1) showed better PER (31.42±1.74) when compared to T4 (0.5% 4TX+ 4 ppm AFB1) group (27.76±0.67). Interaction between different growth parameters of tilapia fed AFB1 and 4TX supplemented diets showed that net weight gain (NWG) was significantly (p<0.01) correlated with average daily gain (ADG), specific growth rate (SGR), feed intake (FI) and protein efficiency ratio (PER). In conclusion, aflatoxin-B1 negatively impacted the growth performance of Nile tilapia regardless the addition of the 4TX clay. Addition of 4TX in the diets has significant effect on some of the parameters tested.


Article Information

Received 09 September 2016

Revised 23 September 2016

Accepted 10 October 2016

Available online 28 January 2017

Authors’ Contributions

DH and AM conceived and designed the study. DH collected and analyzed data and wrote the article.

Key words

Nile tilapia, Calcium bentonite clay, Aflatoxin-B1, Growth performance, Correlation matrices.

* Corresponding author: sirdilawar@yahoo.com

0030-9923/2016/0004-1161 $ 8.00/0

Copyright 2016 Zoological Society of Pakistan

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.2.425.431



Introduction

 

Aflatoxins are toxic compounds that are produced mainly by two naturally present mold species (Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus). These fungal species are abundant in the soil and are a common contaminant of feed crops in warm and humid environments (Fowler et al., 2014). Oilseed crops such as corn, cottonseed and peanut meal are mostly contaminated with aflatoxins. In warm and humid conditions, fish meal, soybean meal, sunflower and other nutritionally complete feeds are also at a risk of aflatoxin contaminations (Hutanasu et al., 2009; Kitya et al., 2010; Kumagai et al., 2008; Tchana et al., 2010). Among all the documented aflatoxins, aflatoxin-B1 (AFB1) is the most widespread and toxic for all the animal species including humans due to its strong mutagenic, teratogenic and carcinogenic effects on these species (Han et al., 2009; Santacroce et al., 2008). Being a wide distribution in tropical and sub-tropical areas of the world where a large number of studies reported the frequent prevalence of aflatoxin contamination, tilapia is repeatedly studied to examine the deleterious effects of AFB1 on its physiological properties and health (Deng et al., 2010). Chen and Rawlings (2008) collected commercial feeds and raw materials from Asia and reported the fact that aflatoxins could be detected in 96.1% of the 334 tests.

Negative effect of AFB1 on the health performance of Nile tilapia were observed in many studies as Zychowski et al. (2013b) reported the deleterious effects of AFB1 in tilapia at lower concentrations such as 1.5 ppm. Mehrim and Salem (2013) have revealed serious lethal effects of incorporating 150 ppb AFB1 in the diets of Nile tilapia with addition to the hepatotoxic effects on the liver than the control group. In another study by El-Banna et al. (1992) it is reported that the growth of Nile tilapia decreases significantly when fed 100 µg AFB1 / kg for a period of 10 weeks, and was observed 16.70% mortality when exposed to a dose of 200 µg / kg.

Extensive research has been designed and carried out to prevent mycotoxicosis in different animal species, including fish that mainly consists of different physical, nutritional chemical or biological means. Vast use of mycotoxin adsorbents that can capture and adsorb the toxin molecules by ion exchange process, thereby delaying their entry into the blood from the gastrointestinal tract has been made considerable attention in the prevention of mycotoxins. Hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS), bentonite, zeolite ore-based compound, canola oil, activated carbon, spent bleaching clay, inorganic adsorbents, some organic acids and alumina-silicates have been disclosed in the prevention of aflatoxicosis (Devegowda and Murthy, 2005).

Deleterious effects of aflatoxins in many animal species has alleviated by the use of clay based, non-nutritive adsorbents. Several studies reported the efficacy of these bentonites and aluminosilicate clays to adsorb and mitigate the harmful effects of aflatoxins by in vitro binding of these toxins in the interlayers and on the edge of the clay structure with relatively high attraction (Phillips, 1999; Desheng et al., 2005; Kannewischer et al., 2006). As a result of this absorbance, the aflatoxins molecules passes through the gastrointestinal tract unabsorbed, in that way decreasing the lethal effects.

The 4TX calcium bentonite clay was selected on the basis of presence of 81.4% smectite which shows its purity level and strong adsorption capacity with aflatoxin-B1 (13.9% w/w) (Velazquez, 2011). Considering the fact that commercial bentonites used in feeding industry are dried and ground to fine powders, we obtained commercial bentonite (4TX) from Southern Clay Products Inc. (Gonzales, Texas, USA). The current study is therefore designed to alleviate the AFB1 induced toxicity by the use of 0.5% 4TX clay against 2 and 4 ppm AFB1 in the diets and to evaluate the potential effects of the clay on growth parameters of Nile tilapia.

 

Table I.- Basal diet Composition (% dry matter basis) fed tilapia for 10 weeks.

Ingredients (%) dry matter basis
Fish meal 11
Soybean meal 46.68
Starch 20.25

Vitamin premixa

3
Mineral premix 4
Carboxymethyl cellulose 2
Soy oil 4.64

CaPO4, dibasic

1
Glycine 1
DL-methionine 0.15
4TX 0

AFB1 (μg)

0
Celufil 6.28
Total 100

a Contains (as g kg−1): Ca(C6H10O6) 5H2O, 348.49; Ca(H2PO4)2 H2O, 136.0; FeSO4 7H2O, 5.0; MgSO4 7H2O, 132.0; K2HPO4, 240.0; NaH2PO4 H2O, 88.0; NaCl, 45.0; AlCl3 6H2O, 0.15; KI, 0.15; CuSO4 5H2O, 0.5; MnSO4 H2O, 0.7; CoCl2 6H2O, 1.0; ZnSO4 7H2O, 3.0; Na2SeO3, 0.011.

 

Material and Methods

 

Experimental diets

Controlled basal diet was formulated having 33.8 g of protein, 8.2 g of lipid, and an estimated 290 KCal of digestible energy 100g− 1. This diet fulfils all published nutrient requirements of Nile tilapia (Table I) (Lim and Webster, 2006). Purified aflatoxins B1 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA and prior to the addition into the remaining ingredients of the diets it is dispersed in chloroform and thoroughly mixed with Celufil. All dry ingredients accurately weighed and then mixed for 40 min in a mixer (V-mixer) then oil was added slowly to mix thoroughly and at the end 400 mL of water was added and mixed in mixer (Hobart mixer) for 50-60 min. The mixer of all the ingredients then passed through a 3-mm die that is attached with a meat grinder. The diets were dried, labelled and then stored at -20 °C for use in experiment. The four experimental diets consisted of: T1, 0% 4TX + 0 ppm AFB1 (Negative control); T2, 0.5% 4TX + 0 ppm AFB1 (Positive control); T3, 0.5% 4TX + 2 ppm AFB1; T4, 0.5% 4TX + 4 ppm AFB1.

Stocking and culturing of tilapia

Nile tilapia fingerlings were imported from a local Hatchery operated in Louisiana State, USA. Before the start of the experiment, tilapia were stocked and conditioned with a commercial diet for 15 days in round tanks and conditioned on basal diet for 7 more days in glass aquaria. A closed, recirculating system consisting on glass aquaria 110-L were used for the feeding trial, where salinity was maintained at 5 ppt by the addition of saline water and temperature was controlled at 26 °C. Water quality parameters (Temperature, pH, Ammonia, nitrite, disolved oxygen and salinity) monitored weekly and keeping below the toxic levels using a biofilteration unit. A total of 144 fish of equal size (4.5±0.4 g) were randomly divided into 4 experimental units (12fish/unit) with three replicates for a period of 10 weeks. Fish were fed at 5% of body weight daily their assigned diet at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. The system was monitored daily to check any abnormalities and mortalities and if any, was removed immediately and recorded.

Fish growth response

After terminating the trial, net weight gain (NWG), average daily gain (ADG), % survival, % specific growth rate (SGR), protein efficiency ratio (PER), feed efficiency ratio (FER), feed intake (FI), and correlation matrices were calculated.

Statistical analysis

All the parameters were computed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) first and then differences among different treatment groups and means were compared by Least Significant Difference (LSD) test. To compute all the statistical data, Statistix, software program version 8.1 (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL) was used. The significance level was set at P≤0.05.

 

Results

 

Growth performance

After 10 week exposure of AFB1 and 4TX clay, there observed a non-significant difference (P>0.05) in % survival among all the treatments. While the growth parameters of tilapia regarding the initial body weight (IBW), final body weight (FBW), average daily gain (ADG), net weight gain (NWG) and specific growth rate (SGR) was significantly (p<0.05) affected after the exposure of AFB1 and 4TX supplemented diets (Table II). Addition of AFB1 in the diets at both 2 and 4 ppm negatively affected the health performance of tilapia, irrespective the supplementation of 4TX in the diets. When supplemented alone, 4TX has significantly higher net weight gain (45.03±5.10) and specific growth rate (2.202±0.07) as compared to 2 ppm (31.63±3.03) and (1.998±0.06) and 4 ppm AFB1 (31.23±5.73) and (1.986±0.11) exposed fish, respectively. The efficacy of 4TX clay in alleviating the AFB1 toxicity at both 2 and 4 ppm AFB1 concentrations remains non-significant (P>0.05).

Feed and protein utilization

Feed efficiency ratio (FER) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) exhibited a significant difference (p<0.05) in all the treatment groups (Table III). T1 showed maximum (0.739±0.02) while T4 showed minimum (0.584±0.03) FER. 4TX clay showed better PER (31.42±1.74) at 2 ppm AFB1 concentration as compared to 4 ppm AFB1 exposed group (27.76±0.67).

 

Table III.- Feed intake, feed efficiency ratio (FER) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) of tilapia AFB1 and 4TX supplemented diets for 10 weeks.

Treatment FI (g/fish) FER PER

T1

61.58±5.56AB 0.739±0.02A 36.36±1.83A

T2

65.70±10.15A 0.689±0.09A 34.53±0.51A

T3

52.14±3.51B 0.624±0.03B 31.42±1.74B

T4

53.00±4.82B 0.584±0.03B

27.76±0.67C

Means sharing similar letters in a column are statistically non-significant (p>0.05). T1, 0%4TX+0 ppm AFB1 (Negative control); T2, 0.5% 4TX+ 0 ppm AFB1 (Positive control); T3, 0.5% 4TX+2 ppm AFB1; T4, 0.5% 4TX+4 ppm AFB1; FI, Feed intake; FER, Feed efficiency ratio; PER, Protein efficiency ratio. Feed efficiency ratio (FER) = Live weight gain (g) / Feed intake (g). Protein efficiency ratio (PER) = Live weight gain (g) / Protein intake (g).

 

Table II.- Means ± SD of growth performance of tilapia fed AFB1 and 4TX supplemented diets for 10 weeks.

Treatment

Body weight (g/fish)

 

Body gain

SGR (%)

Survival (%)

IBW

FBW

 

NWG (g/fish)

ADG (g/fish/d)

T1

4.657±0.20B

50.14±4.02A

 

45.49±3.85A

0.607± 0.05A

2.209± 0.05A

94.44± 4.81A

T2

5.050±0.15A

50.07±5.24A

 

45.03±5.10 A

0.600± 0.07A

2.202± 0.07A

94.44± 4.81A

T3

4.467±0.11B

36.10±3.13B

 

31.63±3.03B

0.422± 0.04B

1.998± 0.06B

97.22± 4.81A

T4

4.710±0.12B

35.94±5.83B

 

31.23±5.73B

0.416± 0.08B

1.986± 0.11B

97.22± 4.81A

Means sharing similar letters in a column are statistically non-significant (p>0.05). T1, 0%4TX+0 ppm AFB1 (Negative control); T2, 0.5% 4TX+ 0 ppm AFB1 (Positive control); T3, 0.5% 4TX+2 ppm AFB1; T4, 0.5% 4TX+4 ppm AFB1; IBW, Initial body weight; FBW, Final body weight; NWG, Net weight gain; ADG, Average daily gain; SGR, Specific growth rate.

Net weight gain (g/fish) NWG = Average final weight (g) – Average initial weight (g).

Average daily gain, (g/fish/day) ADG = AWG (g)/Experimental period (days).

Specific growth rate (SGR, %/day) = [In final weight – In initial weight] x 100/Experimental period (d).

Survival rate (SR %) = End number of the alive fish/The beginning number of the fish x 100.

 

Table IV.- Interaction between growth responses of tilapia fed different levels of AFB1 and 4TX supplemented diets for 10 weeks.

Control Variables IBW FBW NWG ADG SGR Survival FI FER
FBW

0.7367**

0.0063

             

NWG

 

0.7222**

0.0080

0.9998**

0.0000

           
ADG

0.7222**

0.0080

0.9998**

0.0000

1.0000**

0.0000

         
SGR

0.7039*

0.0106

0.9931**

0.0000

0.9937**

0.0000

0.9937**

0.0000

       
Survival

-0.1242

0.7005

-0.1255

0.6976

-0.1243

0.7004

-0.1243

0.7004

-0.055

0.8641

     
FI

0.7933**

0.0021

0.9359**

0.0000

0.9324**

0.0000

0.9324**

0.0000

0.91**

0.0000

-0.296

0.3500

   
FER

-0.1513

0.6389

0.3732

0.2322

0.3865

0.2146

0.3865

0.2146

0.3954

0.2034

0.0224

0.9449

0.173

0.590

 
PER

0.2993

0.3446

0.7287**

0.0072

0.7359**

0.0064

0.7526**

0.0047

0.71**

0.0087

-0.425

0.1676

0.622

0.031

0.547

0.064

Upper values indicated Pearson’s correlation coefficient; lower values indicated level of significance. *, Significant (P<0.05); **, Highly significant (P<0.01).

 

Correlation matrices

Interaction between different growth parameters of tilapia fed AFB1 and 4TX supplemented diets are shown in Table IV. Net weight gain (NWG) was significantly (p<0.01) correlated with specific growth rate (SGR), protein efficiency ratio (PER), average daily gain (ADG) and feed intake (FI).

Water quality parameters

All the water quality parameters were found within the range (temperature, 25.5–27.2oC; pH, 7.89–8.61; ammonia, 0.11-0.20 mg/1N NH3; nitrite, 0.03-0.09 mg/1N NO2 L; dissolved oxygen, 5.42–6.51 mg-L and salinity, 0.41-0.48 ppt) optimum for tilapia growth (Table V).

 

Table V.- Physico-chemical analysis of control and AFB1 and 4TX treated aquaria.

Week

Temp. (°C)

pH Ammonia Nitrite Dissolved Oxygen Salinity
Initial 26.7 8.52 0.14 0.03 6.45 0.42
1. 26.7 7.89 0.11 0.03 6.51 0.43
2. 26.6 8.45 0.15 0.03 5.99 0.41
3. 27.2 8.46 0.12 0.04 6.32 0.48
4. 26.7 7.96 0.12 0.05 6.30 0.46
5. 26.8 8.39 0.13 0.04 6.31 0.47
6. 26.9 8.48 0.18 0.03 6.36 0.42
7. 25.5 8.53 0.14 0.03 6.39 0.44
8. 26.7 8.61 0.13 0.04 5.87 0.46
9. 26.8 8.54 0.20 0.09 5.42 0.42
10. 26.7 8.46 0.12 0.03 6.35

0.41

Ammonia, (Mg/1N NH3); Nitrite, (Mg/1N NO2 L); Dissolved Oxygen, (Mg/L); Salinity, (Ppt).

 

Discussion

 

In tropical and subtropical regions of the world, a high risk of aflatoxin contamination has been observed in many studies due to the higher use of plant based alternatives in animal diets that ultimately have lethal effects on fish health. Overall, aflatoxin-B1 negatively affected the tilapia over a course of 10 weeks. The results of current study showed a reduction in specific growth rate (SGR), average daily gain (ADG) and net weight gain (NWG), and at both the supplemented levels of AFB1. Fish exposed to 4 ppm AFB1 affected the most comparing with 2 ppm AFB1 offered fish and control groups. This negative effect of AFB1 on growth parameters at 2 and 4 ppm proved anti-nutritional nature of AFB1 as described in previous findings (Al-Faragi, 2014; Ayyat et al., 2013; Chavez-Sanches et al., 1994; Deng et al., 2010; El-Banna et al., 1992; Encarnacao et al., 2009; Salem et al., 2010; Sepahdari et al., 2010; Shehata et al., 2009; Zaki et al., 2008; Zychowski et al., 2013a, b).

In the present study, % survival remained almost the same (p<0.05) among tilapia exposed to 2 and 4 ppm AFB1 concentrations along with controls. Our results was confirmed by the study of Tuan et al. (2002) who concluded that when tilapia exposed to 10 ppm AFB1/kg or less have not increased the mortality over a period of 8 weeks. In another study by Chavez-Sanchez et al. (1994), it is reported that even when exposed to 30 ppm AFB1/kg did not cause death in tilapia. Our results regarding the survival confirmed this trend.

In the present study, protein efficiency ratio (PER) and feed efficiency ratio (FER) was also decreased significantly (p<0.05) with the increasing AFB1 concentration. Our results regarding the feed and protein utilization are in line with the previous findings by Abdelhamid et al. (2004), Hussein et al. (2000), Nguyen et al. (2002) and Salem (2002). The possible explanation of this toxicity and deleterious effect of AFB1 may be because of pathological modifications in the gastro-intestinal tract of the fish (Murjani, 2003). Also, our results was in line with the results of Nguyen et al. (2002) who proposed that when fish offered a diet ranging from 10 and 100 ppm AFB1/kg was expelled out when ingested. When fish administrated a diet having 100 ppm AFB1/kg diet, only consumed 59 ppm AFB1/kg of its body weight, the three times than the amount for fish fed the 10 mg AFB1/kg. Additionally, the results of the study of Salem (2002) reported that a significant reduction (P<0.05) was observed in protein and feed efficiency feed in tilapia when fed with dietary AFB1. Similar findings regarding the protein and feed utilization were reported by Abdelhamid et al. (2002b).

Addition of 4TX clay in the diets did not show any significant difference regarding the growth parameters at both 2 and 4 ppm AFB1 exposed groups except in protein efficiency ratio in which 0.5% 4TX+2ppm AFB1 group (T3) showed higher (31.42±1.74) PER as compared to 0.5%4TX+4ppm AFB1 (27.76±0.67) group (T4). The theory behind this effectiveness is that mycotoxin adsorbents such as 4TX strongly binds with the AFB1 molecules present in the feed that it prevents the absorption of AFB1 in the digestive tract of the animals. The efficacy of 4TX to adsorb and remove the intoxication of AFB1 in animal species was also reported by Fowler et al. (2014), (2015) and Velazquez (2011). Bentonite clays were found active in minimizing the bioavailability of aflatoxins (Chaturvedi et al., 2002; Desheng et al., 2005; Magnoli et al., 2008). All the water quality parameters were found suitable for the optimum growth of Nile tilapia as described in previous studies (Abdelhamid et al., 2002b).

 

Conclusions

 

The results showed significant difference (p<0.05) regarding the growth parameters among all the dietary treatments. Fish exposed to 4 ppm AFB1 performed poorly in terms of growth performance when compared to 2 ppm exposed fish and the control groups. Both negative (T1) and positive (T2) control groups showed maximum growth performance over AFB1 offered fish. Supplementation of 4TX in the diets has positive effects on fish growth with better PER in 2 ppm AFB1 group compared to 4 ppm AFB1 exposed fish. So, a clay binder such as 4TX if used efficiently have the potential to reduce AFB1 exposure, thereby preventing bioavailability and consequent effects, such as decreases in growth parameters and immunosuppression and in Nile tilapia.

 

Acknowledgment

 

The authors would like to thank Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for partial support through International Research Support Initiative Program (IRSIP).

 

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

 

References

 

Abdelhamid, A.M., Abdelkhalek, A.E., Mehrim, A.I. and Khalil, F.F., 2004. An attempt to alleviate aflatoxicosis on Nile tilapia fish by dietary supplementations with chicken-hatchery by-products (egg shells) and shrimp processing wastes (shrimp shells) 2-On clinical, blood and histological parameters. J. agric. Sci., 29: 6175-6196.

Abdelhamid, A.M., Khalil, F.F.M., El-Barbary, M.I., Zaki, V.H. and Hussein, H.S., 2002b. Feeding Nile tilpaia on Biogen® to detoxify aflatoxic diets. Proc. 1st Confr. Animal & Fish Prod., Sept, 24-25, Mansoura, Egypt, pp. 207-230.

Al-Faragi, 2014. The efficacy of prebiotic (β-Glucan) as a feed additive against toxicity of hepatocarcinogenicity for four aflatoxins by two expsure routes in rainbow trout. Mutat. Res., 399: 223-244.

Ayyat, M.S., Abd-Rhman, G.A., El-Marakby, H.I., Mahmoud, H.K. and Hessan, A.A.A., 2013. Reduction in the aflatoxin toxicity in Nile tilapia fish. Egypt. J. Nutr. Feeds, 16: 469-479.

Chaturvedi, V.B., Singh, K.S. and Agnihotri, A.K., 2002. In vitro aflatoxin adsorption capacity of some indigenous aflatoxin adsorbents. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 72: 257-260.

Chavez-Sanchez, M.C., Palacios, C.A.M. and Moreno, I.O., 1994. Pathological effects of feeding young Oreochromis niloticus diets supplemented with different levels of aflatoxin B-1. Aquaculture, 127: 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)90191-0

Chen, H.Y. and Rawlings, R., 2008. The truth of mycotoxin contamination of feed in Asia region. China Poult., 30: 33-35.

Deng, S.X., Tian, L.X., Liu, F.J., Jin, S.J., Liang, G.Y., Yang, H.J., Du, Z.Y. and Liu, Y.J., 2010. Toxic effects and residue of aflatoxin B1 in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (O. aureus) during long-term dietary exposure. Aquaculture, 307: 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.07.029

Desheng, Q., Fan, L., Yanhu, Y. and Niya, Z., 2005. Adsorption of aflatoxin B1 on montmorillonite. Poult. Sci., 84: 959-961. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.6.959

Devegowda, G. and Murthy, T.N.K., 2005. Mycotoxins: their effect in poultry and some practical solutions. In: The mycotoxin blue book (ed. D.E. Diaz,), Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, England, pp. 25-50.

El-Banna, R., Teleb, H.M., Hadi, M.M. and Fakhry, F.M., 1992. Performance and tissue residue of tilapias fed dietary aflatoxin. J. Vet. Med., 40: 17-23.

Encarnacao, P., Srikhum, B., Rodrigues, I. and Hofstetter, U., 2009. Growth performance of red tilapia (O. niloticus x O. mossambicus) fed diets contaminated with aflatoxin B1 and the use of a commercial product to suppress negative effects. World Aquaculture, 2009. Veracruz, Mexico, (Abstract).

Fowler, J., Hashim, M., Velazquez, A.L.B., Deng, Y. and Bailey, C.A., 2014. Utilization of a spray-applied calcium bentonite clay to ameliorate the effects of low-levels of aflatoxinin starter broiler diets containing DDGS. Nat. Prod. Chem. Res., 2: 127-130.

Fowler, J., Li, W. and Bailey, C., 2015. Effects of calcium bentonite clay in diets containing aflatoxin when measuring liver residues of aflatoxin B1 in starter broiler chicks. Toxins, 7: 3455-3464. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7093455

Han, D., Xie, S., Zhu, X., Yang, Y. and Guo, Z., 2009. Growth and hepatopancreas in gibel carp fed diets containing low levels of aflatoxin B1. Aquacult. Nutr., 16: 335-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00669.x

Hussein, S.Y.I., Mekkawy, A.A., Moktar, Z.Z. and Mubarak, M., 2000. Protective effect of Nigella sativa seed against aflatoxicosis in Oreochromis niloticus. Proc. Conf. Mycotoxins and Dioxins and the Environment, Bydgoszcz, 25-27 Sept., pp, 109-130.

Hutanasu, C., Sfarti, C., Trifan, A., Hutanasu, M. and Stanciu, C., 2009. Aflatoxin contamination of food: additional risk factor for chronic liver diseases. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iasi., 113: 1061-1065.

Kannewischer, I., Arvide, M.G.T., White, G.N. and Dixon, J.B., 2006. Smectite clays as adsorbents of aflatoxin B1 initial steps. Clay Sci., 12: 199-204.

Kitya, D., Bbosa, G.S. and Mulogo, E., 2010. Aflatoxin levels in common foods of South Western Uganda: a risk factor to hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl.), 19: 516-521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01087.x

Kumagai, S., Nakajima, M., Tabata, S., Ishikuro, E., Tanaka, T., Norizuki, H., Itoh, Y., Aoyama, K., Fujita, K., Kai, S., Sato, T., Saito, S., Yoshiike, N. and Sugita-Konishi, Y., 2008. Aflatoxin and ochratoxin A contamination of retail foods and intake of these mycotoxins in Japan. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Contr. Expo. Risk Assess., 25: 1101-1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030802226187

Lim, C. and Webster, C.D., 2006. Tilapia biology, culture and nutrition. The Haworth Press, Inc., Binghampton, New York, USA, pp. 469-501.

Magnoli, A.P., Cabaglieri, L.R., Magnoli, C.E., Monge, J.C., Miazzo, R.D., Peralta, M.F., Salvano, M.A., Rosa, C.A.R., Dalcero, A.M. and Chiacchiera, S.M., 2008. Bentonite performance on broiler chickens fed with diets containing natural levels of aflatoxin B1. Rev. Brasil. Med. Vet., 30: 55-60.

Mehrim, A.I. and Salem, M.F., 2013. Medicinal herbs against aflatoxicosis in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Clinical signs, postmortem lesions and liver histopathological changes. Egypt. J. Aquacult., 3: 13-25

Murjani, G., 2003. Chronic aflatoxicosis in fish and its relevance to human health. J. Am. Vet. med. Assoc., 176: 719-724.

Nguyen, A.T., Grizzle, J.M., Lovell, R.T., Manning, B.B. and Rottinghaus, E.G., 2002. Growth and hepatic lesions of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus fed diets containing aflatoxin B1. Aquaculture, 212: 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00021-2

Phillips, T.D., 1999. Dietary clay in the chemoprevention of aflatoxin induced disease. Toxicol. Sci., 52: 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/52.2.118

Salem, M.F.E., 2002. Effect of dietary graded levels of aflatoxin B1 on growth performance and chromosomal behaviour of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Ph.D. Thesis, Kafr El-Sheikh, Tanta University, Egypt.

Salem, M.F.I., Shehab, E.M.T., Khalafallah, M.M.M.A., Sayed, S.H. and Amal, S.H., 2010. Nutritional attempts to detoxify aflatoxic effects in diets of tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus). J. World Aquaculy. Soc., 5: 195-206.

Santacroce, M.P., Conversano, M.C., Casalino, E., Lai, O., Zizzadoro, C., Centoducati, G. and Crescenzo, G., 2008. Aflatoxins in aquatic species: metabolism, toxicity and perspectives. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 18: 99-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-007-9064-8

Sepahdari, A., Ebrahimzadeh, M., Sharifpour, H.A.I., Khosravi, A., Motallebi, A.A., Mohseni, M., Kakoolaki, S., Pourali, H.R. and Hallajian, A., 2010. Effects of different dietary levels of Aflatoxin B1 on survival rate and growth factors of Beluga (Huso huso). Iran. J. Fish. Sci., 9: 141-150.

Shehata, S.A., El-Melegy, Kh. M. and Ebrahim, M.S., 2009. Toxicity reduction of aflatoxin B1 by vitamin C in fish. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 4: 73-86.

Tchana, A.N., Moundipa, P.F. and Tchouanguep, F.M., 2010. Aflatoxin contamination in food and body fluids in relation to malnutrition and cancer status in Cameroon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Hlth., 7: 178-188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7010178

Tuan, N.A., Grizzle, J.M., Lovell, R.T., Manning, B.B. and Rottinghaus, G.E., 2002. Growth and hepatic lesions of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets containing aflatoxin B1. Aquaculture, 212: 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00021-2

Velazquez, A.L.B., 2011. Texas bentonites as amendments of aflatoxin-contaminated poultry feed. Master’s thesis, Texas A&M University, USA.

Zaki, M.S., Sharaf, N.E. Rashad, H. Mastala, S.O. and Fawzy, Q.M., 2008. Diminution of aflatoxicosis in tilapia nilotica fish by dietary supplementation with fix in toxin and Nigella sativa oil. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. environ. Sci., 3: 211-215.

Zychowski, K.E., Hoffman, A.R., Ly, H.J., Pohlenz, C., Buentello, A., Romoser, A., Gatlin D.M., Philips, T.D., 2013a. The effect of aflatoxin-B1 on red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) and assessment of dietary supplementation of NovaSil for the prevention of aflatoxicosis. Toxins, 5: 1555-1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins5091555

Zychowski, K.E., Pohlenz, C., Mays, T., Romoser, A., Hume, M., Buentello, A., Gatlin, D.M. and Phillips, T.D., 2013b. The effect of NovaSil dietary supplementation on the growth and health performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed aflatoxin-B1 contaminated feed. Aquaculture, 76: 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.11.020

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Memberships
 
Follow Smith & Franklin
Commons Attribution License

This license permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original S&F work is properly cited.

Creative Commons License